now I have taken a whole day to read the many texts of your homepage and I am really very impressed. You combine Buddhism, New Age, reincarnation theory, conspiracy theories, ufology, spiritualism and who knows what else, to your own world view. Pretty similar, I have also made it and makes it probably every curious seeker. In order not to talk around for a long time, the whole gives already a relatively round picture, only one I have not understood now yet. Do you now assume a free will of the human being or not. On the one hand you recognize a determinacy of everything existing, which would include then also all produced thoughts and human intentions, on the other hand you mention repeatedly the free will of an individual soul. I would be very pleased about an answer.

I was very pleased with the prompt reply. All right, so you let the contradiction continue. But why can't you acknowledge that in your example with the three cave entrances, the decision which of the three entrances you take is also predetermined by the causality of everything that exists? But apparently you would like to preserve a little bit of free will after all, right?

after your last Posting the following thoughts go me now by the head and/or are sent by the head and/or arrive into my consciousness:
But now he has written it again very clearly. "So may we all be free to recognize our bondage ..." Beautifully, in such a way I see it also.

But doesn't he then have to correct the contradictory text passages on his homepage? I will observe that in any case for a few months. But I guess he won't change anything in the texts.
Why not?
Well, because that would probably be technically quite complex and besides, he would actually have to change everything.
Why is that?
Well, because the original indecision between "free will of individual beings" and "everything is cause and effect and has its origin in God" has finally permeated every text or has affected all his texts.

Oh, let it be. His homepage is nevertheless very entertaining and stimulating. He seemingly smokes just sometimes pot with pleasure and then he must get rid of his "truths" nevertheless also.
Should everyone be allowed to offer his ufovisions and conspiracy fears simply declared as truth?
Sure, why not? The intention behind it seems to be to give new thought impulses, to point to the possibility of extraterrestrial visitors etc. and to put at all times the own world view to the discussion. That the objective truth none of us knows is clear.

O.k., then we thank for the humorous suggestions and wish him still many small enlightenments.
Yes, but he should always remember never to spread fears about the future, but to always look at all things positively. ( In case the joint was not so good, he is welcome to keep his horror visions of people being harvested by greys or the like to himself. )

I thank you from the bottom of my heart for your many postings (to the one in the conspiracy forum I still answer later...).

You mean, I may correct the many text passages on my HP concerning the freedom of the will, since I have made now a clear contrary statement. To this I would like to say to you that not all texts have originated at the same time. Those text passages which refer to the freedom of the will are generally older views of me. And I change my view of the things of this world constantly, since always new information approaches to my spirit which it - so I find - is to be considered in each case.

Nevertheless: If I say e.g. in the text "Grays" that Grays "fear" our free will, then I make this statement in the context that those Grays who are here think collectivistically. This means, each individual acts according to the measure of his species in its wholeness - and this ain't so with the people of this earth. For this reason we appear for those grays mostly - also in our controllability - rather unpredictable, and this I see as expression of the free will which I address in this text.

So I have long considered (already some time ago) whether I should adapt those passages to my present thinking. I did and do not do this, however, because every view has its justification at every time and I generally understand my pages as suggestions to switch on the OWN common sense. If you read through the older postings in the forums (and look at the texts on Aquarius), you will realize that I just ask you to think for yourself and not to take over the opinion of another (also and especially mine) without reflection.

Your entertaining question-answer-posting raises the thought, I may - if it was not so nice with smoking pot - keep my views to myself. Well - I'm happy to tell you, only one text was written under the effect of a hallucinogenic substance - and this already in 1994 (the little fool). Generally I smoke for many years just one or two joints a year, which is too little to be seriously psychotic and too much to remain indifferent …

I know about the generally possible rejection of my words and I don't worry about it, because in ALL texts I strive to convey my thinking and my world view. And this means: I am at least honest to myself. Whether others may share or reject my thoughts is not my concern; it is a matter of everyone thinking FOR THEMSELVES and developing their own view. As the Arabic saying goes in "sayings", "If you want to change your country, .... change yourself."

And as for your possible doubt and general skepticism about the truth of extraterrestrial life on planet Earth, I also cannot give you MY certainty, which YOU can only realize FOR YOURSELF. But I tell you gladly: I have met many extraterrestrials and stand in contact with some being which does not come from here (let alone is native in our "dimension") and get thereby a lot for my spirit mediated. To believe these words may be difficult for you, because why should you trust my words gullibly just like that? Therefore and just e.g. the text "Grays" or the text "Telepathy" is a suggestion to go on your own journey - because we mostly believe in ourselves and the experiences which we have made ourselves. So I ask you from the bottom of my heart: Be free (hihi, "free" again) to believe what YOU want and maybe realize that your consciousness can drive your mind to recognize or to delude.

Well, I haven't thought about this question for a very long time and therefore I can only answer you from my gut. And there I am never so sure whether this is then probably "right" ??

For me will arises in the form of an emotion, which has a certain goal to reach to the purpose, causally (I believe at least at the moment) out of our perception (NOT sense perception about sense organs, but in our actual spirit being). And our perceptions, on the other hand, in turn determine this very perception. So there must be a cause for the will beyond the own experiences - the will arises therefore already before we step into the life (and is therefore also responsible for the fact that we are born at all). I mean in any case only so spontaneously at the moment and want to think about it gladly still longer in the next days, since I find the thought very interesting. So please don't take my short "plugging" for real coin, let alone for (even just) a reasonably clear intermediate result. I'd like to think it through again....

But maybe YOU can help us ??? I am curious about your answer,

Well - then only times n'en beautiful vacation you …

I'm looking forward to the fact that we - when YOU are back again - can continue to talk.